Case for Scriptural Mormonism

Here is my working theory based on what I know from history and the history of the Bible and theology and Christianity in general going back to the first century. As I see it, original Christianity was very clearly a monkish phenomenon producing effeminate seeded male-brides who were not to fight fight back and even Matthew 19:12 encouraging permanent celibacy as the ideal. You don't have freedom fighters but dying martyrs voluntarily seeking death rather than fighting back or seeking freedom from oppression. They are not seeking to topple the power hierarchy who is oppressing but instead are giving into their oppressors by dying a martyr: so that they can gain Supernatural connection with their messiah-husband in the afterlife and he will get revenge for them. This martyrdom theme is carried on all the way into the Book of Revelation where male virgins who die martyrs are rewarded with exaltation next to their husband Jesus. 

Based on books like The Germanization of Medieval Christianity we can see clearly that under the later Roman Church hierarchy that developed based on the pseudographic/disputed letters of Paul and later pagan converts to Christianity in the second century, that after the first Jewish Christians like Paul, Peter and John of Patmos died out and most of the Christians became non-jewish pagans, Roman ideals and pagan virtues from the Germanic tribes and the Scandinavians and Indo-European warrior culture was filtered into Christianity under the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church. 

So basically up to about 1500 you had a pro-european Christian Church and while there were problems with the Inquisition and witch hunts and other issues, you had a generally positive theology about Europeans or Anglo-Saxons and other Indo-European peoples. 

All of this changed with the rise of protestantism, for the removal of a masculine hierarchy and the development of a more Leftist interpretive hermeneutic / interpretive method, you had the removal of the priest class, kings, and spiritual revelators of scripture and Prophets and Popes and Bishops as authority figures to interpret scripture; and so the removal of these guardrails would start out as a good and noble project of protest against Catholic Church hierarchical abuses and manipulation of the pew-sitter; unfortunately, this also gave too much power to the individual to interpret the Bible any way he wanted leading to thousands of denominations based on thousands of different individual interpretations. 

For the first 500 years of the Protestant Reformation this was not a problem because the standard cultural narrative was European excellence and respect for European culture; but slowly the phenomenon of deconstruction and anti-whiteism began to develop and you soon saw the rise of 4th wave Feminism and other far-leftist political ideologies infecting the Protestant churches (see The Rise of Cultural  Marxism in less than 5 minutes by Heydel Mankoo by John Anderson Media): leading to the phenomenon of "white guilt," anti-whiteism, and anti-masculinity; and this was possible because the doctrine of Sola Scriptura took precedence over the Church Authority and it's masculine hierarchy, which led to a return to the original authentic Pauline letters: where you had a more gender-bending, femininizing theology going on of seeded male brides, and so these far-leftist anti-man type Protestant churches had authoritative grounds in biblical Pauline scripture to push a far-leftist ideology, because they could even call the pseudographic/disputed letters of Paul that are more pro masculine, as not authentic scripture; and so by going to the core foundation of Christianity (the authentic letters of Paul) and the pro-martyrdom message and the celibacy encouragement, and overall leveling ideology, you had a heavy arsenal for attacking the masculine instincts (e.g. competing for resources, status-seeking and conquest toward dominion and procreation, etc.) and so most Protestant churches had lost the game; and so what you began to see in the 2020s is the rise of Eastern Orthodox "Ortho Bros" and an attempt by Protestants to produce a more pro-masculine theology with new books on "the masculine Jesus" in the title. 

The problem with all of this is you still have the problem of the New Testament being a foreign book and not a European book about European peoples and history, that's number one; and number two, postmodernism and deconstruction has already been established in Bible history departments and so every educated person who has read the scholarship of say Paul Middleton knows you can't put the "genie back in the bottle," in other words Sola Scriptura allows for anti-white feminized readings of the New Testament, and there is just no way of getting around it. This is evident in the Ortho Bros, whose behavior themselves is more Nietzchean than actually Pauline. 

Since Christians are so committed to sola scriptura and only the New Testament is "God's word," they are stuck in a bind as Europeans; they are stuck holding their Authority as a Book by foreign culture, a foreign people who spoke a foreign language with an original message that basically sought to feminize them and make them docile and weak as Nietzche rightly argues. The germanization process I mentioned earlier was a kind of internal psychological antibody where they basically ignored the authentic Pauline letters and focused on what's called the pastoral letters or disputed letters of Paul, but with the rise of deconstruction and feminism, you have a return of that original authentic Pauline layer coming to the surface. So the way I see it, the way forward for the promasculine, pro-European Christian is, they can turn to the foundational hierarchies and the germanization of medieval Christianity through the conservative branch of the Catholic Church or the Eastern Orthodox Church, or they can explore a third alternative. 

There is yet in my view a third alternative and that is continuing the Protestant Reformation but expanding it to replace the New Testament alone method with Mormon Scripture as the authority, so that instead of just the Apostle Paul writing in the Middle East from a Jewish perspective, you have Joseph Smith revealing new scripture revelation as an Anglo-Saxon man in North America. So you have an Anglo-American revealing new scriptural revelations and ideals that is more conducive to a healthy masculine mentality and more in line with American culture and values as scripture produced by someone speaking the English language from an Anglo-Saxon / European perspective. 

I call this Scriptural Mormonism where the current LDS leaders are not to be treated as Popes or Prophets but as managers of a Corporation. So Mormon scripture becomes the authority replacing the New Testament alone method, by understanding that Mormon scripture includes the New Testament but as well as The Joseph Smith Translation. So that with the 1876 Mormon scripture Cannon, canonized by Brigham Young through the work of Orson Pratt, you have that original spiritual vitality Anglo Nordic energy in the words filtered through each reader in their own way; so that you have a new energy being filtered through Northern Europeans that can revitalize them and counteract 4th wave feminism and anti-whitism and instill a new psyche, a revive sense of energy and vitality and self-esteem for Anglo-Americans.